"AvoidAClaim" Blog

LAWPRO's blog helps you avoid legal malpractice claims
Subscribe

Archive for November, 2010

The top things you can do to avoid a legal malpractice claim

November 30, 2010 By: DanPinnington Category: Biggest claims risks, Communication errors, Risk management strategies

In most areas of law practice, lawyer/client communication problems are the number one cause of claims, followed closely by deadline and time management issues. Together they typically account for more than half the malpractice claims LAWPRO sees. Failures to know or apply substantive law typically account for about 10% of claims. See The Biggest Claims Risks article for more detail about the most common malpractice errors.

So, while knowing substantive law is important, from a claims prevention point of view you get more for your risk management efforts by focusing on improving client communications and focusing on getting things done on time. With this in mind, here are my top tips for avoiding a malpractice claim:

  1. Start out on the right foot with a written retainer: The retainer letter or agreement is your terms of engagement. It should clearly identify who the client is and what you are retained to do.
  2. Get the money up front: At the time you are retained, get a retainer that is sufficient to cover all initial work that needs to be done on the matter. Replenish retainer funds before they are exhausted (set up your accounting system to monitor and remind you when the amount in trust is getting low). Stop working on the file if the retainer is not replenished – working on credit greatly increases the likelihood you will not get paid for your work. Of course, you can and should do pro bono work, but only when you choose to do it.
  3. Control client expectations at all times: Clearly and accurately communicate to your clients the available courses of action and possible outcomes; all the implications of any decisions; how long thingswill take; and the expected fees and disbursements.
  4. Document everything (almost): It is just not practical to document everything on everymatter, but you should document asmuch as you can in some contemporaneousmanner. Letters are fine, but e-mails, detailed time entries, andmarginal notes on documents can be equally effective. In particular, you want to record advice or instructions that involve significant issues or outcomes, and major client instructions or decisions. Documenting things is especially important when you are dealing with difficult or emotional clients.Memorialized communications help confirm what was said or done for the client in the event you ever need or want to look back to explain why or what work was done, to justify an account, or to defend yourself on a malpractice claim.
  5. Meet or beat deadlines: Set realistic deadlines when it comes to completing tasks and/or delivering things to clients. Underpromising and over-delivering (i.e. earlier than promised) on work for clients will make them very happy. Don’t leave things to the very last minute as unexpected events beyond your control (blackouts, snowstorms, taxi got lost on way to file documents) will prevent things from happening as required. Giving yourself an extra day or two by setting your deadline before the real deadline can be a lifesaver.
  6. Don’t do any of the things that most annoy clients: These are all the things that would equally annoy you. They include not returning calls or e-mails, long periods of inactivity, surprising a client with bad news or a large account.
  7. Don’t handle a matter with which you are uncomfortable: If you are unsure or hesitant about handling thematter for any reason (e.g. unfamiliar with the area of law, a potential conflict exists, matter for a relative or friend, demanding or difficult client), get appropriate help or refer it to another lawyer.
  8. Don’t wait until after the file is closed to ask how you did: Ask clients for feedback as thematter progresses, atmilestones or when interim accounts are rendered. Talk to major clients at least once a year, and do this off the clock!
  9. What goes around comes around: Your reputationwill precede you. Be civil all of the time, to your client, the counsel and client on the other side, judges and court staff.
  10. Send interim and final reporting letters: They should confirm what work was done, and the successes obtained for the client. For example: For example: Retainer terminated, futures steps, and so on.
  11. Don’t sue for fees: This almost guarantees a counter-claim alleging negligence.
  12. Document everything (almost): Read #4 again – it is the best way to avoid a claim.

Doing all these things will help you avoid the most common malpractice errors and ensure you have happy clients. And remember, happy clients don’t tend to sue their lawyers.

Cross posted on Slaw.ca and Lawyer Success Tips

Family collection scam email from Kathy Cheung [Updated January 28, 2011]

November 11, 2010 By: DanPinnington Category: Confirmed frauds, Family law, Fraud prevention

Between mid-November and late December 2010 we heard from several lawyers that received messages from the purported Kathy Cheung (ex is Terry Cheung). Update: Through January 2011 we heard from almost 50 lawyers that received messages from Cheung similar to the initial contact and subsequent messages below. Many of the lawyers we heard from are in Ontario, but we also heard from from lawyers in other provinces and across the U.S. In reply messages, the location of the ex-husband was personalized to the location of the lawyer (In the sample message below it is indicated the ex-husband had connections in Ontario.). It appears that hundreds if not thousands of lawyers have received this initial contact message over the last several months.

One of the lawyers that contacted us exchanged several emails with her and they appear below, along a copy of the Collaborative Family Law agreement allegedly prepared by lawyers and provided as evidence of the agreement by her ex-husband to pay.

The messages this fraudster sent are virtually identical to messages other lawyers have received recently on collaborative family law agreement scams from the purported Peggy Higashi and Beverly Kawashima.

From: Kathy Cheung [mailto:cheungkathy23@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 2:49 PM
To: Lawyer email address
Subject: Greeting Counsel
Greeting Counsel

Great day to you, my purpose for contacting your firm is to inquire for representation.

I have a premium settlement case that needs to be addressed and finalized as soon as possible. The need to gain your representation is to enforce the settlement agreed upon by my ex-spouse and me.

This agreement was base on $868,654.00; it has not been formally adhered to properly, by my ex-husband.

I say this because, as of today he still owes me a gross amount of $712,584.00 in settlement funds. These were supposed to be paid in full by August, 2010. I am in the process of retiring from my job as a sales associate and travel coordinator for the Korean Airways.

I am currently posted in South Korea and will be finishing my employment contract. I am in the process of settling down with my new spouse and kids, therefore collecting all owed funds are essential to us. I am unable to abandon my work to handle this issue back in America; therefore your counsel will be greatly welcomed and appreciated. Please inform me if you are able to take on this case.

I believe you understand what needs to be done, so before we proceed I will need to review your retainer agreement and also your fees so we can proceed. I await your earnest reply.

Yours truly
Kathy Cheung


Dear Ms. Cheung,
Please tell me how you were referred to me. Second, please let me know the reason for non-payment. Third, what assets do you believe your ex-husband may have, particularly in California.


Good-day counsel and so many thanks for your response to my letter, as I am sorry for my late responses to your mail,just return from the hospital today. I guess the (+13hrs) time difference makes it kind of difficult to gauge the best time to reach you and vice versa.

I came across you contact when searching a good law firm in San Francisco, California and after reading your profile I was convince you would stand for me.

I would have the opportunity to talk to you sometime but (due to my hear pose a more difficult time on phone conversation) thought you should know what I am asking or looking for by email which enables me present/express my case better than telephone due to my hearing problem as this has been on for
close to two years. Really hope I could get my hearing healings back one of these days.

Well like I early side the agreement will be forwarded to you and if any question do not fail to ask.

Terry and I agreed under the Collaborative Law Agreement which I have attached for a one time cash settlement of $868,654.00. To his credit, he has paid me $156,070 but still owing $712,584.00 and has requested for more time over and over again.

The divorce is not final and the agreement was never put before a judge because Terry was very much insistent that he didn’t want to go to court and he constantly threatened that if we went to court, he will ensure that I went away with nothing because he had accumulated most of his assets before we got married and had paid a sizeable settlement after his first marriage. It was thought at the time that all parties would work towards meeting the terms of the agreement.

I too had agreed to the terms of the agreement which is well within what Terry can pay conveniently because I didn’t want the troubles of a long trial and so that we could part ways in the best way for all it was worth.

However Terry is been economical with the truth claiming a failed investment set him back financially. I however have information that this is not the case.

I will be pleased if we could settle this without the troubles of litigation and have advised my ex-husband that I am already in the process of retaining your services to achieve a final closure of this over-delayed payments.

Terry has recently relocated temporarily from California to Ontario (I think he is setting up a business there) but California remains his main base. We lived there together for 3 and 1/2 years and he still has property there and I believe both his personal and business accounts reside there. His address in Ontario is below:

288 Dufferin Avenue,
London, ON
Canada N6A 4L9
607 241 7089 / 224 855 3546
Email: cheunterry@aol.com

I will be pleased to provide further information on this matter on request. If you are happy to proceed, kindly send me a copy of your retainer and if the terms are acceptable I will sign so we can commence the process without delay.
Thank you very much and I hope we can work together to resolve this.

Your Faithfully

Kathy Cheung.

43 Bukok-Dong,Kunpo-Shi,
Kyonggi-Do,South Korea
DOB: 21th June 1970

Click here to view a copy of the Collaborative Family Law agreement provided by the fraudsters

These emails are separately addressed to individual lawyers (in many cases these fraud blasts are BCCs and appear as addressed to “undisclosed recipients”). Note that the From email address is different than the email address listed in the body of the email.

If you have been targeted by this fraud, please forward any of the emails you have received to fraudinfo@lawpro.ca.

If you have been successfully duped, please immediately notify LAWPRO (instructions on how are here), as there may be a claim against you.

Further fraud prevention information and resources are available on the practicePRO Fraud page (www.practicepro.ca/fraud), including the Fraud Fact Sheet, a handy reference for lawyers and law firm staff that describes the common frauds and the red flags that can help identify them.