"AvoidAClaim" Blog

LAWPRO's blog helps you avoid legal malpractice claims
Subscribe

Too much information: The dangers of blogging about your client

September 28, 2010 By: DanPinnington Category: Biggest claims risks, Privacy, Technology

If you are not careful, the Internet can be a dangerous place that can expose you to malpractice claims. LAWPRO Magazine has featured articles on Social media pitfalls to avoid and how there may be no coverage for some online activities: Danger Signs: Five activities generally not covered by your LAWPRO policy.

Another recent LAWPRO Magazine article on Practice pitfalls contains a section on Internet liability, which points out that “statements that lawyers make on the Internet, whether on law firm or other websites, or on social media sites such as Facebook, are a significant potential growth area for claims.”

On his The Trial Warrior blog, Toronto lawyer Antonin Pribetic has a great post that contains sage advice on the dangers of breaching client confidentiality with a blog post — Too Much Information: Blogging about your client.

Not only does the post contain great practical advice; it backs it up by citing relevant rules and commentary from the Law Society of Upper Canada’s Rules of Professional Conduct.

“In the end,” Pribetic concludes, “ask yourself this question: why am I writing this blawg post about my client’s case? If the answer is ego-fulfillment, self-promotion or catharsis, stop typing and delete the post. Even if your reasons are altruistic, get your client’s express consent first, and then save your draft and post after the final judgment is rendered and all appeals are exhausted.”

If you have a blog you should read Pribetic’s Too much information: The dangers of blogging about your client post.

Cross posted on Slaw.ca

Print Friendly

One Response to “Too much information: The dangers of blogging about your client”


  1. Very good post! The need to tell war stories certainly spills onto the Internet–with perils multiplied. Adage of “You can’t unring a bell” describes attempts to de-publish what should never have been published. Pribetic’s advice to save draft after getting client’s consent and posting only after final judgment rendered and appeals exhausted will likely diminish the number of “great posts” cooling. Timely post appreciated and will be shared with Oregon attorneys!



Leave a Reply